Kerala's own figures have now been read against the national norms, and the question this page raised has an answer: they are not a Kerala variation. They are the old national figures.
What was compared. The Kerala State Horticulture Mission publishes a scheme details page with rates against several components. This platform holds the national MIDH operational guidelines of April 2025 and has taken 64 sourced statements from them. Madhya Pradesh's department publishes a full copy of the April 2014 edition of the same national document. All three were opened.
What it showed. Kerala's page matches the 2014 national text closely enough to leave little doubt about where it came from.
On rejuvenation, Kerala says assistance is 50% of cost limited to 2 hectares per beneficiary. Paragraph 7.20 of the 2014 national guidelines says assistance for rejuvenating or replanting senile plantations will be at 50% of the cost limited to 2 hectares per beneficiary. The wording is the same.
On organic farming, Kerala says additional assistance over and above the area expansion programme at ₹10,000 per hectare, limited to 4 hectares per beneficiary, spread over three years. Paragraph 7.30 of the 2014 guidelines gives additional assistance over and above the area expansion programme for a maximum of 4 hectares per beneficiary spread over three years, with assistance limited to ₹10,000 per hectare. Again the same.
On vermicompost, Kerala says ₹50,000 for a unit of 30 by 8 by 2.5 feet. The 2014 guidelines say 50% of cost subject to a maximum of ₹50,000 per beneficiary for a unit having size 30 by 8 by 2.5 feet. The dimensions match to the inch.
The current national guidelines say something different on the first two. Rejuvenation is 40% against cost norms of ₹10,000 and ₹40,000 per hectare, and organic farming carries no NHM figure at all — the guidelines send it to PKVY norms. The 4 hectare limit that appears twice on Kerala's page is a 2014-era limit; the current document uses 2 hectares for these components.
What this means for you. Do not plan a project in Kerala from the figures on that page, and do not treat them as Kerala paying more than the rest of the country. On the evidence they are a description of the scheme as it stood in 2014 that has not been revised since. The national guidelines of April 2025 are what govern, and the guides below explain them with the page of the document each figure came from.
This is our reading of three documents rather than a statement by the Mission, and Kerala may have its own reasons for the page as it stands. If you are about to commit money, ask the Mission directly which figures apply — and if they confirm a Kerala rate that genuinely differs from the national one, tell us, because that would be worth a page of its own.
What is still missing: any dated Kerala order setting these figures; whether the state tops the national norms up from its own budget, which states may do; and the district offices that receive applications.