Skip to the content

NHM

Horticulture subsidy in Lakshadweep: coconut goes to a different board

The Directorate of Agriculture names the Mission among the central schemes it implements. But horticulture here is coconut before anything else, and the national guidelines route coconut through the Coconut Development Board, funded in full rather than on the usual split.

  • Awaiting verification
  • 3 min read
  • Lakshadweep
Illustrative image
Ask about this
Awaiting verification
Author Editorial team Applies to NHM · Lakshadweep
Evidence or review is not yet complete. Verify anything here against the official source before relying on it. Scheme decisions and approvals rest with the relevant authorities.

This is what we have read, not what the state pays. Nobody has yet confirmed a Lakshadweep figure against the national norms, and this page does not give you one. It tells you what Lakshadweep publishes, what is in it, and what to do with that. The national cost norms that apply meanwhile are in the guides linked at the foot of this page.

Lakshadweep is one of the few places where the department confirms in its own words that the Mission runs here — and where the Mission is probably not the door most growers want.

What the directorate says

The Department of Agriculture lists the central sector schemes it implements, and the Mission for Integrated Development of Horticulture is named among them, alongside PM-KISAN and the Kisan Credit Card. It publishes an online document repository and gives a postal address and telephone numbers at Kavaratti.

That is the door, and it is recorded here. No scheme document was found on it, so nothing is registered.

Why coconut changes the answer

Horticulture in Lakshadweep is coconut before anything else, and coconut is the business of the Coconut Development Board — a separate body alongside the Mission rather than a part of it. So the Mission's component list is not where a coconut grower here will find their scheme.

Mark what that last sentence is. We have recorded no statement from the national guidelines about how coconut is routed or how the Board is funded, so it is a pointer rather than a sourced fact — good enough to send you to the Board first, not good enough to budget against. Every figure on this site names the document and page it came from; this does not, which is why it is flagged.

That has a practical consequence worth stating plainly: a grower here is likely to be dealing with that Board rather than with the Mission's general components, and the Board has its own schemes, its own terms and its own application. Reading the Mission's component list and finding nothing that fits a coconut holding is not a failure of the search — it is the guidelines sending you somewhere else.

This platform has not covered the Coconut Development Board. That is a real gap for this territory specifically, and we would rather name it than let a reader assume the Mission material here is complete for them.

One national rule that names this territory

Lakshadweep is one of the four union territories the National Horticulture Board's circular of 21 August 2026 names for the higher 45% rate of assistance rather than the 35% general rate. That is an NHB rule rather than a Mission one, and it is not a Lakshadweep figure — it is a national circular that happens to name this territory. It applies to Board schemes, not to Mission components.

What to do

If your holding is coconut, start with the Coconut Development Board rather than the Mission. If you are doing something else — vegetables, spices, protected cultivation — the national guides below carry the components and figures, each naming the page it came from. Either way the directorate at Kavaratti is reachable by post and telephone, which on a site with no published scheme document is the most reliable route to an answer.

What is still missing here: what the directorate's document repository holds, and whether the Coconut Development Board is in fact the right door for most growers. Both are worth someone's time.

Sources

No official source has been linked to this page yet. Treat it as unverified.

Version history (4)
DateChangeReasonStatus
10 Oct 2026 Updated — Awaiting verification
09 Sep 2026 Closed a paragraph left open by the previous edit. — Awaiting verification
09 Sep 2026 Removed an assertion about how the national guidelines route coconut and fund the Coconut Development Board. No claim on this platform supports it, so it is now marked as an unsourced pointer. — Awaiting verification
09 Sep 2026 Created — Awaiting verification
Report an issue

Spotted something outdated or wrong? Tell us what and, if possible, where the correct information is. No account or phone number needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. The Directorate of Agriculture names the Mission for Integrated Development of Horticulture among the central sector schemes it implements, alongside PM-KISAN and the Kisan Credit Card.

Probably not. Coconut is the business of the Coconut Development Board, a separate body alongside the Mission with its own schemes, terms and application. We have recorded no statement from the national guidelines on how that routing works, so treat it as a pointer to ask the Board first rather than as a sourced rule.

Because coconut is handled by the Coconut Development Board rather than through the Mission's general components, so finding no coconut component is not a gap in your search. We have not covered that Board, and we have recorded no statement from the guidelines about the routing itself.

Lakshadweep is one of four union territories the Board's circular of 21 August 2026 names for 45% rather than 35%. It applies to National Horticulture Board schemes, not to Mission components.